Are you listening?

The programmers have the basis for an excellent game, but . . .
As one person pointed out the game is programmed in favored of any players who purchases tokens (or if you will players who buy victories). I have two other players who I play. We agree on the "tools" for the game and comment on the words that are found. Absent the agreement, the game may be had for the payment of money.
Also, there is an admitted problem with the game. The company states that it will be fixed "shortly". Their definition of shortly is different from mine.
Finally, the programmers are a lazy group. They built into the program the feature that allows a player to add a word. A word is denied and the player may choose to add the word. The player is asked to specify which word and to use the word in a sentence. The player then in 100% of the time is forced to play without the submitted word. Additionally, the player will NOT receive any notification of any kind. A player can quote and cite other dictionaries, but that player will not receive any notice of any kind. A player can locate and provide a quote from literature using the submitted term, but the player will NOT receive any notice.
This is a word based game, but the programmers seem immune to any rational inclusion.
This is a good game that could be great, but management and possibly ownership are currently an impenetrable brick wall in the way of greatness.
Reference to thick as a brick.

Braiseman about Word Streak With Friends: Paid, v6.31